Crimes and Trials of Lyle and Erik Menendez

In 1989, brothers Lyle and Erik Menendez used a 12-gauge shotgun to murder their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez. The trial received national attention because it had all the elements of a Hollywood movie — wealth, incest, parricide, infidelity, and murder. Jose Menendez Jose Enrique Menendez was 15 years old when his parents sent him to the US from Cuba after Castro took over. Influenced by his parents, who were both champion athletes in Cuba, Jose also developed into a good athlete and later attended Southern Illinois University on a swimming scholarship. At the age of 19, he met and married Mary Kitty Anderson and the couple moved to New York. There he earned an accounting degree from Queens College in Flushing, New York. Once out of college his career soared. He proved to be a highly focused, competitive, success-driven employee. His climb up the ladder eventually led to a lucrative position in the entertainment industry with RCA as an executive vice president and chief operating officer. During this time Jose and Kitty had two boys, Joseph Lyle, born January 10, 1968, and Erik Galen, born November 27, 1970. The family moved to a prestigious home in Princeton, New Jersey, where they enjoyed comfortable country-club living. In 1986, Jose left RCA and transferred to Los Angeles where he accepted the position of President of Live Entertainment, a division of Carolco Pictures. Jose earned a reputation as being a heartless, tough numbers cruncher, which turned an unprofitable division into a moneymaker within a year. Although his success brought him a certain level of respect, there were also many people who worked for him that completely despised him. Kitty Menendez For Kitty, the West Coast move was disappointing. She loved her life in New Jersey and struggled to fit into her new world in Los Angeles. Originally from Chicago, Kitty grew up in a broken middle-class home. Her father was physically abusive to his wife and children. They divorced after he left to be with another woman. Her mother never seemed to get over the failed marriage. She suffered from depression and deep resentments. Throughout high school, Kitty was sullen and withdrawn. It was not until she attended Southern Illinois University that she seemed to grow and develop self-esteem. In 1962, she won a beauty pageant, which also seemed to bolster her confidence. In her senior year of college, she met Jose and fell in love. She was three years older than he was, and a different race, which at that time was frowned upon. When Jose and Kitty decided to marry, both their families were against it. Kittys parents felt the racial issue would lead to unhappiness and Joses parents thought that he was only 19 and too young to marry. They also did not like that Kittys parents were divorced. So the two eloped and soon afterward headed to New York. Kitty turned away from her future goals and went to work as a schoolteacher while Jose finished college. It seemed to pay off in some ways after his career took off, but in other ways, Kitty lost herself and became completely dependent on her husband. She spent much of her time tending to the boys and waiting on Jose when he was home. When she discovered that Jose had a mistress and that the relationship had lasted over six years, she was devastated. He later admitted to cheating on her with several women throughout their marriage. Like her mother, Kitty never seemed to get over Joses infidelities. She too became bitter, depressed and even more dependent. Now, having moved across the  country, she had lost the network of friends that she had in the northeast and felt isolated. After having children Kitty gained weight and she lacked style in her clothing and general appearance. Her taste in decorating was poor and she was a bad housekeeper. All of this made acceptance in the affluent Los Angeles circles a challenge. On the outside, the family looked close-knit, like a perfect family, but there were internal struggles that took its toll on Kitty. She no longer trusted Jose and then there was the trouble with the boys. Calabasas The San Fernando Valley suburb called Calabasas is an upper-middle-class area and where the Menendez moved to after leaving New Jersey. Lyle had been accepted into Princeton University and did not move with the family until months later. During Lyles first semester at Princeton, he was caught plagiarizing an assignment and was suspended for one year. His father attempted to sway Princetons president, but without success. At this point, Jose and Kitty were both aware that the boys were incredibly spoiled. They got most everything that they wanted — great cars, designer clothing, money to blow and in exchange, and all they had to do was live under the strict controls of their father. Since Lyle was thrown out of Princeton, Jose decided it was time for him to learn some life lessons and he put him to work at LIVE. Lyle was not interested. He wanted to go to UCLA and play tennis, not go to work. However, Jose would not allow it and Lyle became a LIVE employee. Lyles work ethic was similar to how he acted towards most things — lazy, disinterested, and leaned on daddy to get him through it. He was constantly late for work and ignored assignments or would just take off to go play tennis. When Jose found out, he fired him. July 1988 With two months to kill before returning to Princeton, Lyle, 20 and Erik now 17, began burglarizing their friends parents homes. The amount of money and jewelry that they stole amounted to around $100,000. After they were caught, Jose saw that Lyles chances to return to Princeton would be over if he was convicted, so with the help of a lawyer, he manipulated it so that Erik would take the fall. In exchange, the brothers would have to go for counseling and Erik was required to do community service. Jose also forked out $11,000 to the victims. Kittys psychologist, Les Summerfield, recommended psychologist Dr. Jerome Oziel as a  good choice for Erik to see for counseling. As far as the Calabasas community went, not very many people wanted anything more to do with the Menendez family. In response, the family headed to Beverly Hills. 722 North Elm Drive After being humiliated out of Calabasas by his sons, Jose purchased a spectacular $4 million mansion in Beverly Hills. The house had marble floors, six bedrooms, tennis courts, a swimming pool, and a guesthouse. Previous occupants included Prince, Elton John, and a Saudi prince. Erik changed schools and began attending Beverly Hills High and Lyle returned to Princeton. The switch was probably difficult for Erik, who had managed to develop some friendships at Calabasas high school. Being the younger brother, Erik seemed to idolize Lyle. They had a deep bond that excluded others and as children, they often played exclusively together. Academically, the boys were average and even that level was hard for them to maintain without the direct help from their mother. Teacher evaluations often included the suggestion that the boys homework was above the capability that they showed in class. In other words, someone was doing their homework for them. And they were right. Throughout Eriks entire time in school, Kitty would do his homework. About the only thing Erik was good at was tennis, and at that, he excelled. He was the number one ranked player on the schools team. In high school, with Lyle no longer involved in his day-to-day life, Erik had his own friends. One good friend was the captain of the tennis team, Craig Cignarelli. Craig and Erik spent a lot of time together. They wrote a screenplay called Friends about a teen that saw his fathers will and went and killed him so he would inherit the money. No one at the time knew the implications of the plot. Spoiled Rotten By July 1989, things for the Menendez family continued to spiral downward. Lyle was on academic and disciplinary probation from Princeton after destroying property. He also tore up the golf course at the country club that the family belonged to, costing their membership to be suspended and thousands in repair cost that Jose paid. Erik spent his energy with failed attempts to make a name for himself in tennis. Jose and Kitty felt that they no longer could control the boys. In an attempt to get them to grow up and face some responsibility for their lives and their futures Jose and Kitty decided to use their will like a dangling carrot. Jose threatened to remove his sons from the will if they did not change the way they were living. Something Was Amiss Based on outside appearances, the remainder of the summer seemed to go better for the family. They were doing things together again as a family. But Kitty, for unknown reasons, did not feel safe around the boys. She spoke to her therapist about feeling fearful of her sons. She thought they were narcissistic sociopaths. At night she kept her doors locked and two rifles nearby. The Murders On August 20, 1989, at around midnight, the Beverly Hills police received a 9-1-1 call from Lyle Menendez. Erik and Lyle had just returned home after going to the movies and found their parents dead in the family room of their home. Both parents had been shot with 12-gauge shotguns. According to autopsy reports, Jose suffered explosive decapitation with evisceration of the brain and both his and Kittys faces were blown apart. Investigation The rumored theory about who murdered the Menendez was that it as a Mob hit, based partially on information from Erik and Lyle. However, if it was a mob hit, it was a definite case of overkill and the police were not buying it. Also, there were no shotgun casings at the murder site. Mobsters do not bother to clean up shell casings. What created more concern among the detectives was the tremendous amount of money the Menendez brothers were spending which began immediately after their parents were murdered. The list was long, too. Expensive cars, Rolex watches, restaurants, personal tennis coaches — the boys were on a spending roll. Prosecutors estimated that the brothers spent around a million dollars in six months. Big Break On March 5, 1990, seven months into the investigation, Judalon Smyth contacted the Beverly Hills police and informed them that Dr. Jerome Oziel had audio tapes of Lyle and Erik Menendez confessing to the murder of their parents. She also provided them information on where the shotguns were purchased and that the Menendez brothers had threatened to kill Oziel if he went to the police. At the time, Smyth was trying to end an alleged relationship with Oziel, when he asked her to pretend to be a patient at the office so that she could eavesdrop on a meeting he was having with the Menendez brothers. Oziel was afraid of the boys and wanted Smyth there to call police in case something happened. Because there was a threat on Oziels life, the patient-therapist confidentiality rule did not apply. Armed with a search warrant the police located the tapes in a safety deposit box and the information Smyth provided was confirmed. On March 8, Lyle Menendez was arrested near the family home, followed by the arrest of Erik who returned from a tennis match in Israel and turned himself into the police. The brothers were remanded without bail. They each hired their own lawyers. Leslie Abramson was Eriks lawyer and Gerald Chaleff was Lyles. The Arraignment The Menendez brothers had full support from most all of their relatives and during their arraignment, the atmosphere lacked the appropriate seriousness for what was taking place. The brothers strutted in like movie stars, smiled, and waved to their family and friends and snickered when the judge began to speak. Apparently, they found the serious tone of her voice humorous. You have been charged with multiple murder for financial gain, while lying in wait, with a loaded firearm, for which, if convicted, you could receive the death penalty. How do you plead? They both plead not guilty. It would take three years before their cases went to trial. The admissibility of the tapes became the big hold up. The California Supreme Court finally decided that some, but not all of the tapes were admissible. Unfortunately for the prosecution, the tape of Erik describing the murders was not allowed. The Trials The trial began on July 20, 1993, in the Van Nuys Superior Court. Judge Stanley M. Weisberg was presiding. He decided that the brothers would be tried together, but that they would have separate juries. Pamela Bozanich, the chief prosecutor, wanted the Menendez brothers to be found guilty and to get the death penalty. Leslie Abramson was representing Erik and Jill Lansing was Lyles lawyer. As flamboyant a lawyer as Abramson was, Lansing and her team were equally quiet and sharply focused. Court TV was also present in the room, filming the trial for its viewers. Both defense lawyers admitted that their clients did kill their parents. They then went about methodically trying to destroy the reputations of Jose and Kitty Menendez. They tried to prove that Menendez brothers had been sexually abused by their sadistic father throughout their lifetime and that their mother, when not participating in her own form of perverse abuse, turned her back on what Jose was doing to the boys. They said that the brothers murdered their parents out of fear that the parents were going to murder them. The prosecution simplified the reasons behind the murder stating that it was done out of greed. The Menendez brothers feared that they were going to get cut out of their parents will and lose out on millions of dollars. The murder was not a spur of the moment attack done out of fear, but rather one that was thought out and planned days and weeks before the fatal night. Both juries were unable to decide which story to believe and they came back deadlocked. The Los Angeles DAs office said they wanted a second trial immediately. They were not going to give up. The Second Trial The second trial was not as flamboyant as the first trial. There were no television cameras and the public had moved on to other cases. This time David Conn was the chief prosecutor and Charles Gessler represented Lyle. Abramson continued to represent Erik. Much of what the defense had to say had already been said and although the whole sexual abuse, incest  direction was disturbing to hear, the shock of hearing it was over. However, the prosecution dealt with the sexual abuse allegations and battered persons syndrome differently than how it was dealt with during the first trial. Bozanich did not address it at all, believing that the jury would not fall for it. Conn attacked it straight on and got Judge Weisberg to block the defense from saying that the brothers suffered from battered persons syndrome. This time the jury found both the Menendez brothers guilty of two counts of first-degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder. Shocking Moment During the penalty phase of the Menendez trial, Dr. William Vicary, who was Eriks psychiatrist since his arrest, admitted that Leslie Abramson asked him to rewrite portions of his notes that were being reviewed because it could be harmful to Erik. He said she called the information prejudicial and out of bounds. One section that was removed pertained to Eriks saying that his fathers homosexual lover told Erik and Lyle that their parents were planning to kill them. Erik told Vicary that the whole thing was a lie. The fact that Abramson had asked the doctor to remove incriminating comments could have cost her her career, but it also could have caused a mistrial. The judge did not allow that to happen and the sentencing phase continued. Sentencing On July 2, 1996, Judge Weisberg sentenced Lyle and Erik Menendez to life in prison without the possibility of parole. The brothers were later sent to separate prisons. Lyle was sent to North Kern State Prison and Erik was sent to the California State Prison.

The Atomic Bomb Changed The Course Of History - 740 Words

The atomic bomb changed the course of history, saving the U.S. from losing to Japan. This bomb had an impact on the world both metaphorically and physically. No such weapon had combined science and technology so smoothly other than the device that, ever since its creation, blew away Hiroshima and Nagasaki. On August 2, 1939, Einstein proposed an interesting to President Franklin D. Roosevelt. This idea, called the atomic bomb, would change the lives of everyone. Making it was easier said than done, though. They needed a team of scientists: Robert Oppenheimer, David Bohm, Leo Szilard, Eugene Wigner, Felix Bloch, Otto Prisch, Rudolf Peierls, Niels Bohr, Emilio Segre, James Franck, Enrico Fermi, Klaus Fuchs, and Edward Teller. Then they had to find U-235, which looked exactly like U-238, a useless material. The process was hard, especially since only mechanical methods worked. Finally, after an extraction system, a magnetic separation, and a gas centrifuge, all that was needed to be done was to test the entire concept in the deserts of Jornada del Muerto (about money). The Gadget was quickly put together. Upon detonating, the white blaze shot through the still-dark sky, slowly transforming into an orange ball of fire shooting up 360 feet per second. The mushroom cloud took form at 30,000 feet. Beneath the grim cloud, all that remained in the soil at the blast site were fragments of jade green radioactive glass created by the heat of the reaction (about money). With a nuclearShow MoreRelatedA Closer Look at the Bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki1485 Words   |  6 Pagesthemselves up for disaster. On August 6, 1945 the course of history was changed. Two atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima, and three days later, August 9, 1945, on Nagasaki that ended World War II. Japan had already been a defeated nation from conventional bombs and World War II. Many innocent lives were lost, psychological scars were left on the lives of the bomb survivors, and thus many lives were changed forever. The atomic bombings caused many people to have genetic effectsRead MoreDebating History : Atomic Age947 Words   |  4 Pages1, 2015 Debating History – Atomic Age Towards the end of World War II, the belief that Americans had of the war was one of invading Japan and ending the war in traditional style and in traditional surrender. However, to the efforts of J. Robert Oppenheimer and fellow associates changed the course of warfare and history by creating the atomic bomb. The Manhattan Project The Manhattan project was a very key point in history that involved the production of the bomb and of course the plan on attackingRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb Was The Most Destructive Thing On The Planet Essay1223 Words   |  5 PagesThe atomic bomb was the most destructive thing on the planet at that time. It had the power â€Å"equal to 12-15,000 tons of TNT† or a â€Å"22-kiloton blast† (Bombing Of Hiroshima and Nagasaki) depending on which of the two atomic bombs are being talked about. Using the atomic weapons is something that should not be taken lightly and does not come without consequences, though. However, ending a war or shortening it by any means necessary is a just cause, but to effectively do so a decision must be made onRead More Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb: By Jason Chamberlin Essay1415 Words   |  6 Pagesto Drop the Atomic Bomb: By Jason Chamberlin The atomic bomb was one of the most impacting event of the 20th century. It forever changed the way that people looked at war. For the first time, the human race possed the ability to destroy on a massive scale, and they actually got to see how they could do it during the second World War. It was a decision that the president, Harry Truman, had to think and decide very carefully on what exactly he wanted to do. Never in the history of war has anyoneRead MoreEssay on Manhattan Project1664 Words   |  7 Pagesresearch for the first Atomic bomb was done in the United States, by a group of the best scientists; this research was given the name of amp;quot;The Manhattan Projectamp;quot;. On Monday July 16th, 1945, a countdown for the detonation of the first atomic bomb took place near Los Alamos, New Mexico. This atomic bomb testing would forever change the meaning of war. As the atomic bomb was detonated it sent shock-waves all over the world. There was endless research done on the bomb in the United StatesRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb Of The United States Essay1748 Words   |  7 Pagesthe detonation of the first atomic bomb took place near Los Alamos, New Mexico. This atomic bomb testing would forever change the meaning of war. As the atomic bomb was detonated it sent shock-waves all over the world. There was endless research done on the bomb in the United States. The research was called The Manhattan Engineer District Project but it was more commonly known as The Manhattan Project. The Manhattan Project was brought by fear of Germany and its atomic research. On account of theRead MoreThe Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki1593 Words   |  7 Pages Bombing of Hiroshima On August 8th 1945 the first atomic weapon, a fission bomb, was dropped on the city of Hiroshima in an attempt to force the Japanese to surrender in World War II (Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 2009). This event exposed the danger of nuclear energy. This massive explosion demolished 90 percent of the city and immediately killed 80,000 people. This was only the beginning though, tens of thousands of innocent people died due to the aftermath of radiation exposure for anotherRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb1584 Words   |  7 Pagesa change in American leadership. Having this change not only changed the outcome of the war that we were currently in, but how the rest of the world would view our country after the war. The decision that Harry Truman was forced to make on the choice to drop the atomic bomb or to attempt more land invasions was a choice that shaped the outcome of the war. There were major influences and side effects from the dropping of the atomic bomb and what it did to the co untry of Japan. Having the option andRead MoreHitler And The Nazi Party942 Words   |  4 PagesUnder the ruling of Hitler and the Nazi Party, Germany inaugurated the war in 1939 with an unexpected invasion Poland. Nearly all of Europe was taken over by Hitler in 1940. By the summer only Britain remain of the European power. The course of the war changed when Britain grabbled with an attack performed by the Nazi Party. Then Hitler, disobeyed an agreement made with the Soviet Union, by ordering an invasion on Britain. Afterwards the United States entered the war when Japan attacked the PearlRead MoreIn Defense of Trumans Use of the Atomic Bomb Essay examples1512 Words   |  7 PagesPresident Harry Truman’s use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan during the Second World War is the most controversial decision in history. While it was an undoubtedly difficult decision, it was indeed necessary in order to end this six-year war that had ravaged the world. While many critics argue that the bomb was used primarily as an act of vengeance toward Japan, simplifying such a crucial moment in human history downplays the very real risk invading Japan posed to the United

Canadian Books In Ontario Public Catholic -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Canadian Books In Ontario Public Catholic? Answer: Introducation The above quoted lines from the book, The Space Between by Don Aker, clearly indicate the existential angst felt by the central protagonist of the novel, The First Stone, by the same author (The First Stone). The novel is often seen to be a portrayal of the social issues faced by the adolescents in the present-day world (Bates). Some of the social issues faced by the adolescents in the present-day world are bullying, sexuality, suicide, peer pressure, teen gambling and various others (Bates). The novel has at its center, the character of Reef Kennedy, who suffers from existential crisis post the death of his grandmother as well his grandfather (The First Stone). Reefs grandmother is the only silver lining in his otherwise dark overclouded life and post the death of his grandmother he is thrown into despair and tries to relieve his pain as well as suffering by causing pain and suffering to others. It is often seen that the negative things of the past can be overcome through effective bonds of friendships and other relations in the present times. This is the thesis statement of the present essay. It is to be noted that at the beginning of the novel, the central protagonist of the novel is found to be careless person, who is trying to recuperate from the death of his grandmother. He is a confused person, who is sent from one foster home to another. He has finally made some new friends, who are helping him to overcome his past troubles. The feelings of Reef, at this point of time are similar to the protagonist of the novel, The catcher in the rye by James Salisbury, when he says that, Among other things, you'll find that you're not the first person who was ever confused and frightened and even sickened by human behavior. You're by no means alone on that score, you'll be excited and stimulated to know. Many, many men have been just as troubled morally and spiritually as you are right now (Bloom). He and his group of friends have a hanging out spot, which is now going to get demolished. He is obviously disturbed by this news. It is at this point of time that he starts feeling, Pe ople are always ruining things for you (The First Stone). His friends are also having their own troubles. Jink, for example is having trouble with his mom, who feels that her son is on the path of self-destruction and thus she says, I tol him and tol him..I sez,you gonna get the shit kicked outta you if you keep spendin time with the likes a Rowdy Brewster. I kin take care s myself, he sezBut when did that boy ever listen tme?. Reef, who is suffering to come to terms with his own emotional problems and says, Mothers are all slightly insane(The First Stone). Reef is so angry with the news that their favorite hangout spot is going to be demolished that he wants to hurt the people, who are going to demolish the place. Therefore, he makes a plan to hurt the people, who are doing the demolition work and takes the help of his other friends. The conversation between him and his friend is interesting here, You sure about this? Bigger asked.Of course I wanna give Rowdy some payback (The First Stone). He tries to hurt them but gets caught in the act and runs away. He finally reaches a place where he thinks that he has finally outsmarted the demolishers. He picks up a stone and hurls it into the darkness to vent out his anger. The stone coincidentally goes and hits a car in which a young girl, Leeza gets hurt and she remains in coma for several months after that. Reef, is overcome by this incidence and is willing to pay the price for his actions. He confesses his crime and is sent to a rehabilitation center. The final stage of his journey begins i n the rehabilitation center, where he helps Leeza to recover from the stage in which he had put her in. The novel, The First Stone can be seen as a novel of sin and redemption just like the novel Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoyevsky (Dostoevsky) and the poem The Rime of the Ancient Mariner by Coleridge (Coleridge). It is important to note that Reef instead of running away from the act, which he has committed, accepts full responsibility for it and is willing to rectify it. The moral as well as spiritual regeneration of Reef begins at the rehabilitation center, where he comes to terms with his moral as well as spiritual depravity. It is interesting to note his own conception about himself when he says, Hallow. Depleted. A body that breathed (The First Stone). Reef at the rehabilitation center begins to question his own past and the kind of life that he has been living till now. His opinion about the words is significant here, He thought about words. Thought about which ones got said and which ones didnt. Like the words he wished hed said to his grandfather. All those times hed bitten them backReef thought about other words. The ones his grandmother used. And the ones he wished hed said to her (The First Stone). It is interesting to note that Leeza knows all along that Reef had a hand in her accident as well as the present condition in which she is right now, but she appreciates the help as well as the atonement that Reef is trying to achieve. She, just like Reef, believes that the negative things of the past can be overcome by the positive deeds of the present. In this context, it can be said that the author is trying to portray the central characters of the novel, as the haunted spirit of Dante in his The Divina Commedia, where he says that the human beings are like the haunted spirits of hell, who have no past as well as no future but only eternal present. Many critics even consider Reef to be a very conscientious character on the basis of his words, I put her in that place. Me. Like Rowdy did to Jink. Except Rowdy used his hands. Looked Jink in the face while he did it (The First Stone). It is also important to note the effort that Reef puts in the recovery process of Leeza. The effort is appreciated by the hospital staffs when they comment that, Shes been a different person since then-eating better, putting a hundred percent into her physio, really taking control of her recovery. Her change in attitude made a world of difference. And you made that happen, Reef (The First Stone). It is interesting to note that at the end of the novel both the characters Reef as well as Leeza consider that both of them can help each other in their healing processes. In this regard, the novel can also be seen as a story, about the choices that people make. Reef and Leeza, at the end of the novel had the choice to go back to their previous lives or they can start on their journey of self-regeneration by helping each other. Therefore, from the above discussion it becomes clear that the novel focuses on the growth as well development of the central character. Reef. In this regard, the novel can also be seen as a story of crime as well as redemption. The central character of the novel commits a mistake and in the rest of the novel he tries to atone for that mistake. It is also important to note that the novel also details with aspects of contemporary adolescent life bullying, peer pressure, sexuality, crime and various other aspects. It is important to note that the journey of Reef through the entire novel reinstates the overall thesis statement of this essay that the negative things of the past can be overcome by the positive relationships as well as the friendships of the present. References Bates, Catherine MF.Use of Canadian Books in Ontario Public and Catholic Intermediate and Secondary English Departments: Results of a Survey of Teachers of Grades 7 through 12. Ontario Book Publishers Organization, 2017. Bloom, Harold, ed.JD Salinger's the Catcher in the Rye. Infobase Publishing, 2014. Coleridge, Samuel Traylor. "The Rime of the Ancient Mariner (text of 1834)."Poetry Foundation. Dostoevsky, Fyodor.Crime and punishment. Penguin UK, 2014. "The First Stone."Browseinside.Harpercollins.Ca, 2018, https://browseinside.harpercollins.ca/index.aspx?isbn13=9780006392866.

Play Love Through The Ages With Maria Fortuna And Nancy Townsend At T

Play: Love Through The Ages With Maria Fortuna And Nancy Townsend At The Sean O'Sullivan Theatre On Friday November 3rd I had the pleasure of attending an evening of Opera titled Love Through the Ages with Maria Fortuna and Nancy Townsend at the Sean OSullivan Theatre. Having never been to an Opera performance I had no idea of what to expect and was looking forward to this new experience. Fortuna was accompanied by multi-faceted pianist Nancy Townsend. These two musicians showed tremendous expertise and were able to keep my attention through the extent of the program. Maria Fortuna is a soprano and she has enjoyed international success with her stunning vocal talent. Fortunas repertoire ranges from the lyric soprano to the dramatic coloratura roles, being performed in front of many large audiences and critics. Fortuna was born in Niagara Falls N.Y and more recently received her Masters of Music which led her to her teaching position at SUNY Fredonia. Nancy Townsend is a pianist, vocal coach, conductor and stage director. She has recently performed in recitals throughout the United States, primarily in the west. As I had no idea of what to expect when entering this concert I went in with an extremely open mind. Even leading up to the intermission I wasnt convinced that I was understanding the structure of opera. However, even with my very limited knowledge of opera I could come to a few conclusions. Fortuna and Townsend evidently worked well together, they were always in sync and fed off of each others talent. As well it seemed as if Fortuna was using an aspect of call and response to enhance her production. Her call would be in the form of a story and she would then answer her call with her singing. The show was slightly disrupted in the first half with a large group of people that had been late for the performance, I couldnt visually see any signs of fault on Fortunas behalf when this occurred. An interesting aspect of Fortunas style was unlike anything I had ever seen before. Fortuna would make stable eye contact with specific sections in the audience, this portrayed the feeling that she was singing for the crowd and not herself. The piece within Fortunas selection in which I enjoyed the most was a classical Spanish song titled La mi sola, Laureola. Within all of the classical Spanish songs love was the overwhelming theme. Within this selection Fortuna used a softer pitch and proceeded all of the way through the scale. Fortuna was able to adapt her voice to fit the style of each song, her narration within the songs taken from Shakespeare sounded as if it were Shakespeare reading to himself. Based on this being my first opera experience I was pleasantly surprised. Fortuna and Townsend entertained us for the extent of the program and proved to this small St. Catherines audience that they were accomplished musicians. Current Events

Production Cost Variance Analyses Essays

Production Cost Variance Analyses Essays Production Cost Variance Analyses Essay Production Cost Variance Analyses Essay Typically, one number represents what actually happened, that is, measured performance. The other number is a performance standard, such as a standard cost, a budget, or historical performance (what happened in the past, such as last month or last year). A variance analysis involves the decomposition of the variance into the individual factors that caused the variance. There is no one way to do variance analyses; many types of variance analyses can be appropriate in certain situations. Some involve comparisons of actual and expected results for individual line items in the accounting records. For example, managers might be interested to know that actual expenses were greater than gutted expenses because travel expenses were higher than expected, or that sales were lower than expected because one large customer did not order its normal quantity of goods. Other variance analyses involve the simultaneous investigation of the effects of prices, volumes, production or sales mixes, and exchange rates. Managers perform these variance analyses because they provide important insights about problems (or opportunities) that might exist. This chapter describes techniques for analyzing production cost variances in a way that provides managers with useful insights in controlling the various organizational elements that affect the performance of the production function. Most manufacturing companies use the standard sets of production variance analyses that are described in this chapter. Chapter 21 discusses variance analyses for other income v. TTS s, Ii-r statement elements. 622 Part 2 Management Accounting Direct Material and Labor Variances TX Direct Material be. The standard direct material cost of one unit of product (I. E. , one unit of stout) is found by multiplying the quantity of material (input) that should be needed for producing one unit of put times the price that should be paid per unit of material input (e. G. , 9 pounds per remit of output at $4 per A standard cost represen ts what the cost should $36 per unit of output). T}nor total standard direct material cost for an accounting period is the standard material cost per unit of output multiplied by the number of units produced in that period (e. 9. , if 100 units are produced, the total standard material cost is $3,600). This total standard material cost ($3,600) also can be calculated by multiplying the total standard quantity of material (900 pounds) by the standard cost per unit of material $4 per pound). The total standard quantity of 900 pounds is 100 units produced times 9 pounds per unit. Similarly, the actual direct material cost of one unit of stout is the actual quantity of material input used in producing that unit times the canal price paid per unit of material. The total actual direct material cost for a period is the sum of these actual costs for all the units produced in the period The differ,once between the total standard material cost and the total actual material cost of the goods actually prà ©cised direct material cost variance. That means that dirt mated variances are based on the actual putout quantity of a period; planned or budgeted output less play no part in the Ana$Russ. Because both the standard and accrual material cost totals were computed by multiplying a physical input quantity (e. G. , if pounds) by a price per unit of input (e. G- $4 per pound), it is possible decomposability material costarring into aquantitycomponentandaprice component,NT Specifically, these component,ants are as felons: pound 1 . The fact that the actual quantity of material used for the stout produced offered from the standard quantity causes the material usage finance (also called the yield variance or simply the quantity variance). . Theft TNT the curia price of each unit of material input tittered from the standardize causes the materialistic variance The algebraic sum of these two variances is the total marital variance{hat is, the difference between total actual direct material costs for the period and total standard direct mated costs. Fifth companys standard cost eastern includes only one account -f for material variance, is sum is the mammoth that would appease in that count. Favorable and Unfavorable Wariness If actual cost is Lorene than standard cost, the variance is said to ; if the reverse, the variance? is said table unfavorable. As explained in Chapter 19, favorable variances layer as credits in variance accords whereas irremovable variances appear as debits. We shall use fees adjectives in the description that follows. Hewer, it should be recognized deferrable in this sense does not necessarily mean that performance was good; it means only that actual costs were laurel +Han standard costs. The As pointed out in Chapter 19, some compartmentalized cost $items have two material variance accounts. Such slotted identify material price variance when the. Inertial is received into materials inventory. When this is done, the material price variance is baaed on the quantity of materials received doing the period rather than the quantity that was USDA during the period. In these systems the material usage variance is developed when materials are sued to production, as shown in Illustration 19-2. 0 Unction Astringencys$sees 623 interpretation of these variances, once they have been identified, is discussed eater. Lower costs can even indicate a problem because they might be the result, for example, of using inferior quality materials. Formulas The commonly used rules for finding the two direct material variances are as follows: 1 . The material usage Viviane is the difference between total standard quantity and total actual quantity femoral input, with each total quantity partici pated standard price per unit of material. Both total quantities are based on the number of units of output actually produced. 2. The malarial price variance is the difference between the standard price ND the actual price per unit of material input, multiplied by the actual quantity of material used Each unit of Product X is supposed to require 9 pounds of direct material costing $4 per pound.

The 9 Reasons You Miss ACT Science Questions

The 9 Reasons You Miss ACT Science Questions SAT / ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips No one likes to make mistakes. However, you cannot ignore the questions you miss, or you will not improve. In this article, I will help you figure out the mistakes you are making on ACT Science questions, and I will give you some ACT Science tips and ACT Science strategies to fix your mistakes. Here are the 9 reasons you're missing ACT Science Questions: Misreading the visuals Not understanding a trend Not understanding the setup of the experiment Misreading the passage Not knowing a science fact Calculation error Careless error Not understanding a viewpoint Not understanding how viewpoints are related I've developed these core reasons after many hours of tutoring students on the ACT Science section. I'll go into more detail on each reason below. Reason #1: Misreading the Visuals This is one of the most common mistakes since it's easy to do, and it applies to a lot of questions in ACT Science. If you read our article on the 3 types of ACT science passages, this mistake is usually connected to factual questions, calculating questions, and interpreting experiments questions. Did you not read the graphs, tables, scatterplots or diagrams correctly? If so, what did you misread? What did you not understand? Make sure to drill this skill, as it is the most tested on the ACT Science section. Here is an ACT Science practice question, more specifically an example of a factual question: There are several mistakes you can make when misreading graphs. Did you look at the wrong figure entirely? Example: Did you accidentally use the top graph of the percent of captured finches from Island A? You should have used the two bottom graphs that covered the percent of captured finches from Island B and C. Did you misread the values along the x: Did you think it said 8 instead of 10? Did you misread the labels along the x: Did you think beak depth was measured along the y-axis? Did you not notice a key? Example: Many visuals will have a key with them. Keys are usually very important. Do not ignore them. You'll recognize these mistakes when your answer choice is very different from the correct answer. If you think you may have misread the visual, start by analyzing the question. Did it refer to a specific figure? Did you look at Figure 2 when it said Figure 1? If it did not refer to a specific figure in the question, did the answer choices have numbers? For example, in question 1 above, the answers A, B, C, and D all have numbers: 8 mm, 9 mm, 10 mm, etc. If the answer choices contain numbers, it is a safe bet that you either needed to read a visual or understand a trend to answer the question correctly. I'll explore understanding a trend mistakes next. ACT Science Tip: If You Think You Struggle to Understand Visuals, You Need to Focus on Improving This Skill Since It Is the Most Tested Skill on the ACT Science Section. In order to improve, I'd recommend taking a few untimed ACT Science sections. Take as much time as you need to answer each question and dissect the visuals provided. Write out the control and variable(s). Write out the values at each data point. By doing this seemingly tedious step, you will be making sure you understand the information the visual is trying to convey. Also, read how to read graphs, tables and data. After reaching an acceptable score when taking untimed sections, I'd start taking timed sections immediately. You'll need to nail the 5-minute per passage timing to succeed on the ACT Science section. There are other reasons connected to data that you miss questions: Reason #2: Not Understanding a Trend If you read our article on the 3 types of ACT science passages, this mistake is usually connected to interpreting trends questions and calculations questions. Were you not able to describe the relationship of the data? Increasing, decreasing, direct, indirect? Here is an ACT Science practice question, more specifically an example of an interpreting trends question: Answering this question requires understanding what caused small seeds or large seeds to be more abundant. In this case, this graph below and the two sentences directly above it provide the information you need. If you misread the graph or mixed up these sentences, you may have gotten the answer wrong. According to the two sentences, small seeds are abundant during wet years. According to the graph, 1984 was a wet year, so J. 1984 is the correct answer. ACT Science Tip: I'd Recommend the Same Approach to Fixing This Problem As With Misreading the Visuals. Take untimed practice sections. Try to draw on the visuals the extrapolation of the data. Draw the line as if it went out further. Follow the table. Put up and down arrows for if the data is going up from point to point or down from point to point. Once you start excelling at these interpreting trends and calculations questions, go back to the 5-minute per passage pace. Understanding trends is key, but you need to understand the experiment to answer in order to answer several questions, which we will discuss next: Reason #3: Not Understanding the Setup of the Experiment If you read our article on the 3 types of ACT science passages, this mistake is usually connected to experimental design/research intent questions and hypothetical experimental questions. Did you not understand the researcher’s intent? Did you not understand the experiment’s design? Did you not know the control versus variables? Here is an ACT Science practice question, more specifically an example of an experimental design question: Answering this question requires understanding what the titrant and sample solution were. In this case, the passage defines what a titrant is and what a sample solution is, but if you misread the passage, it's easy to mix it up, especially since it's just a bunch of liquid being mixed together anyway. Be sure to skim the passage for this information if you cannot figure it out from the visuals alone. Again, I would recommend slowing down, taking untimed sections. Make sure you read the passage carefully, and then, once you get to a better score, work on the timing. If you still need help figuring out the variables in an experiment or understanding the scientist’s intent, read our article on experimental design questions. In order to understand the experimental design, you need to read the passage carefully, which bring us to our next reason: Reason #4: Misreading the Passage Did you miss key information from the passage needed to answer the questions? Make sure you read carefully. If you are not 100% sure what the answer is, go back and skim if you have the time. Try to be 100% sure before you move on to the next question. Regarding the question in Reason #2, it would be easy to misread the two sentences you need to answer the question correctly. If you were reading too quickly, you may think that the small seeds were abundant during dry years and answer incorrectly. ACT Science Tip: Take Your Time and Make Sure You Understand What You Read, so You Get the Correct Answer. Again, try taking untimed sections. Circle and underline key information as you read the passage to make sure you do not misread it. Sometimes reading the passage and visuals to answer the questions is just not enough. There are rare cases where you need outside knowledge to answer the question. Reason #5: Not Knowing a Science Fact If you read our article on the only actual science you need to know for ACT Science, this mistake is on those questions. These questions only appear about 4 times per test and require outside science knowledge. To make sure the mistake is because of a lack of outside knowledge, re-read the entire passage and make sure they do not give you the information you need to answer the question. If you still think it is an outside knowledge question, make a flashcard with the information you didn’t know. Below is an ACT Science practice question, more specifically an example of a question that requires outside knowledge: The question expects you to know that protons are positively charged, electrons are negatively charged, like charges repel each other, and opposite charges attract each other. Nowhere in the passage is this property of charges stated- you just have to know this from your science class experience. Knowing what you do, you can eliminate F and H. In this case, the passage stated the reaction uses protons, so the answer is G. ACT Science Tip: Study the Flashcards, so You Get the Scientific Information Down. You should make flashcards for all of the topics from the only actual science article and drill yourself. Also, be sure to do some additional light research to refresh your memory of that concept. It is not necessary to read a book on the subject, but just be sure you have a basic understanding of the concept. Because there are 13 topics mentioned in that article and only around 4 used per practice test, it is possible you may not come across all of them in your studies. You do not want to be surprised the day of the test, so make flashcards and make sure you know them! NOTE: Knowing this material is the only way to get a score between 31 and 36. If you are aiming for a score of 30 or below on the ACT Science section, you do not need to spend as much time focused on these questions, since they only account for about 4 questions per test. In addition to outside science knowledge, you need some basic math knowledge to answer certain questions. If your math skills are off, you may miss questions for this reason: Reason #6: Calculation Error These errors are only on Calculation Questions, in which you need to use math to answer the question. You are not allowed to use a calculator on the ACT Science section, so make sure you are still able to do basic math in your head. Did you make a small calculation error in question that requires basic math? Did you do the wrong math calculation? Find the average incorrectly? Here is an ACT Science practice question, more specifically an example of a calculations question: For this question, you need to interpolate (fancy word for find the in between numbers). You need to find the value of average change in AGTB at 75 m from the center of the plot to the nearest clearing. After examining the scatterplot, I see there are points marked at 70 and 80 m from the center of the plot to the nearest clearing, but not at 75 m, this gap in data is what makes this an interpolation question! You have the data that surround the point, but you need to figure out what the point is. What mathematical calculation could you do (using the data you do have) to find the approximate average change in AGTB at 75 m from the center of the plot to the nearest clearing? Perhaps, averaging the average change in AGTB for 70 m and 80 m from the center of the plot to the nearest clearing? At 70m from the center of the plot to the nearest clearing, the average change in AGTB is about -3.1. At 80m from the center of the plot to the nearest clearing, the average change in AGTB is -2.2. Now, calculate using the average formula: Sum of the values / (divided by) the number of values: ((-2.2) + (-3.1)) / 2 = -5.2 / 2 = -2.6 Then, compare it to the answer choices. So, the answer is G. It would be easy to make a small mathematical error here. Did you subtract instead of add? Did you multiply instead of divide? ACT Science Tip: Make Sure You Apply the Correct Calculation (Typically Average Formula) and That You Didn’t Make Any Sort of Careless Math Mistake. Which leads us to our next topic: Reason #7: Careless Error Did you misread the question? Did you not see a NOT or EXCEPT? Make sure to read the questions closely and circle or underline the NOT or EXCEPT so you don’t miss it. It would be very easy to read this too fast and think the question is asking which of the following is true. I have watched many of the students I tutor make that mistake, and I have made that mistake myself. Try to read carefully to avoid these careless mistakes. ACT Science Tip: Circle the NOT or EXCEPT to Make Sure You Do Not Forget It. The next two reasons are from the Conflicting Viewpoints Passage. Read more about this type of passage in the 3 types of ACT Science passages article. Reason #8: Not Understanding the Point of View If you read our article on the 3 types of ACT Science passages, this mistake is usually connected to understanding of viewpoints questions. NOTE: This mistake will only occur on the Conflicting Viewpoints Passage. ACT Science Tip: If You Continue to Struggle With These Types of Question, Circle and/or Underline As You Read the Passage to Make Sure You Remember the Point of View of Each Student/Scientist. What is their argument? What do they believe? Write yourself a three word or fewer summary after reading the paragraph i.e. â€Å"pro-comet theory,† â€Å"anti-comet theory.† Answering this question requires understanding Student 2's point of view. In this case, Student 2 said that Algol B became a part of the Algol system because Algol B intersected orbits with the original Algol system. So, the original Algol system exerted a gravitational force on Algol B. Therefore, the answer is H. If you did not understand Student 2's argument, then you would get this question wrong. There is only one other kind of mistake you can make on the Conflicting Viewpoints Passage. Reason #9: Not Understanding the Differences and Similarities in the Points of View If you read our article on the 3 types of ACT science passages, this mistake is usually connected to comparing viewpoints questions. NOTE: This mistake will only occur on the Conflicting Viewpoints Passage. Were you able to differentiate between the two scientists/students? How were their viewpoints similar? Answering this question requires understanding both Scientist 1's and Scientist 2's point of view and knowing the similarities between them. In this case, both agreed the object exploded at 8 km above the Earth, so we can eliminate B, C, and D. Therefore, the answer is A. If you did not know this key similarity between them, you probably would have answered incorrectly. Recap There are 9 reasons you miss questions, and there are several ACT Science strategies to fix them! Misreading the visuals Take untimed sections until you get your score where you want it. Read our other article on Factual Questions: How to Read Graphs, Tables, and Data for more practice on these questions. Not understanding a trend Take untimed sections until you get your score where you want it. Read our other article on Interpreting Trends for more practice on these questions. Not understanding the setup of the experiment Take untimed sections until you get your score where you want it. Read our other article on Experimental Design Questions for more practice on these questions. Misreading the passage Take untimed sections until you get your score where you want it. Practice with one of the many free ACT tests available. Not knowing a science fact Create flashcards after reading our other article on the only actual science you need to know for ACT Science. Study the flashcards until you have them down. Calculation error Take untimed sections until you get your score where you want it. Read our other article on Calculation Questions for more practice. Careless error I know these are frustrating, but just try to take your time. Circle and/or underline NOT or EXCEPT, so you do not miss it. Not understanding a viewpoint Write brief notes to yourself after reading each viewpoint, so you remember their argument. Read our other article on Attacking Conflicting Viewpoints Passages and Questions for more practice on these questions. Not understanding how viewpoints are related Again, try to write brief notes for yourself to help you identify the main difference between the viewpoints. Read our other article on Attacking Conflicting Viewpoints Passages and Questions for more practice on these questions. Conclusion: Practicing and Noticing These Mistakes You should practice using real ACT Science Practice Tests; check out our upcoming articles for more information on where to find them. After taking an ACT Science practice test, you should always review. This is the most important step in your study process as it is how you learn. Read more about review and how to study and practice for ACT Science in our other article. When reviewing your missed questions from your practice tests, categorize your missed questions into 1 of the 9 categories above. Tally up the number of mistakes in each category. If most of your mistakes fall into 1 or 2 categories, focus on improving that particular skill by working on the related question type (factual, calculation, interpreting trends, understanding viewpoints, etc.). Find more information on each question type in our other ACT science articles. What’s Next? I recommend continuing your reading by learning about the 3 types of ACT Science passages. Also, understand the reasons you make mistakes. Learn the hardest ACT Science questions and strategies to solve them. Also, learn the best ways to study and practice for ACT Science. Like this article? Want to improve your ACT score by 4 points? Check out our best-in-class online ACT prep program. We guarantee your money back if you don't improve your ACT score by 4 points or more. Our program is entirely online, and it customizes what you study to your strengths and weaknesses. If you liked this Science lesson, you'll love our program. Along with more detailed lessons, you'll get thousands of practice problems organized by individual skills so you learn most effectively. We'll also give you a step-by-step program to follow so you'll never be confused about what to study next. Check out our 5-day free trial:

Research paper draft 3 Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Draft 3 - Research Paper Example It is actually marked by an increase in communication and getting in touch with with the rest of the world which in turn brings things such as movie theater running water, electricity and railroad. The characters survive on earth that is believed not to exist, while outside features of which they are not aware determine their future. The world in this novel is characterized by cyclical and repetitions. The important of the world in this novel is that it insightfully explores the role played by historical awareness on the part of the people living on the occasion. Additionally, it depicts the role that it may take in determining any history. During that time Macondo was a village of approximately twenty houses, built on the bank of a river of clean water. For that reason many things than were within this village were deficient in names and it was necessary to point when indicating anything. As illustrated in the book, the elements of structure, form and theme relate and correspond with each other cohesively. The novel’s subversive function is derived by the dialectic synthesis of imaginary and real phenomenon together with the actual and potential mythological vision of Macondo. The author Garcia Marquez attempts to reflect contradictions witnessed in the past century on historical development of the capitalist society as the central theme, solitude, illustrates the Marxist conception of alienation. This is defined as experiencing the world passively in form of a subject separated from the object (Garcia, 380). The characters in One Hundred Years of Solitude are in touch with themselves indirectly and are completely isolated from humanity. This implies that the Buendia family lack Mark’s view of species consciousness. The individuals are not only alienated from other men and women but also from humanity itself. Characters try to establish alien power over others in